Search Results

Marketing hype or happiness/productivity hack? KEY POINTS A 4DWW improves work-life balance, reduces stress, and enhances overall happiness. Employers see advantages like higher morale, reduced turnover, and maintained (or even improved) productivity. A 4DWW improves work-life balance, reduces stress, and enhances overall happiness. The prior 4CL post

One opinion Another opinion KEY TAKEAWAYS In Cross Purposes: Christianity’s Broken Bargain with Democracy , journalist Jonathan Rauch argues that American Christianity is in crisis, losing members and moral authority as churches focus more on politics than the teachings of Jesus Christ. It’s also a crisis for democracy, Rauch argues, because Christianity is a “load-bearing wall” in America’s liberal democracy. As an atheist, Rauch frames his book as an outsider’s attempt to learn from Christianity by examining its values through a secular lens. Related thoughts

Wharton Nano-Tool: from brainwave to breakthroughs Related paper Excerpt: Goal Apply neuroscience-based strategies to unlock innovative thinking, problem solving, and breakthrough ideas in yourself and your team. Nano Tool Creativity is paramount for driving innovation, solving complex challenges, and enhancing employee engagement, regardless of industry. Whether you’re leading a financial services firm or a health care organization, harnessing creative thinking can unlock new opportunities and elevate success. Neuroscience research reveals that creativity isn’t just a mysterious talent; it’s a trainable skill rooted in specific brain processes.

Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one may find life’s deeper meanings. Excerpt: " M y preoccupation with writing about meaning, love, and happiness derives from my desire to understand these parts of life more deeply, and impart to others whatever understanding I can glean. I will confess that this can be a frustrating task at times because I feel as though I can never get to the essence of these sublimities; words always feel inadequate. For a long time, I believed that at some point—maybe after writing a million more words—I would finally arrive at the ability to adequately express what it is that I’m seeking. The philosopher Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein, who died in 1951, probably would have told me I was barking up the wrong tree. The writer and fellow philosopher Bertrand Russell called Wittgenstein’s work “perhaps the most perfect example I have ever known of genius as traditionally conceived, passionate, profound, intense and dominating,” yet Wittgenstein did not leave us much of it. He published only one book of philosophy in his life, the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus , which itself is only about 75 pages long. In it, Wittgenstein explained that language can never convey the fullest understanding of life. “The limits of my language,” he wrote, “mean the limits of my world.” Wittgenstein was no doubt conscious of the irony of making this argument through language. But in so doing, he offered a path to getting beyond words and to apprehend, after all, the ineffable essence of what we seek. Arthur C. Brooks: The ultimate German philosophy for a happier life Human communication is rife with misunderstanding, as social scientists have long observed . Researchers writing in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology in 2011 showed that people misunderstand the intended meaning of what others say, especially among close acquaintances such as family and friends. The scholars found that those who spoke with strangers communicated more clearly than with close associates, believing—incorrectly—that the latter would understand ambiguous phrases by virtue of their intimate affiliation. So what are the odds that you’ll grasp correctly the next thing your spouse tells you? Digital communication makes the situation worse because it eliminates nonverbal cues."

The outrageously accomplished magician-inventor-author chats to Big Think about fear, multitasking, and successful work-life reinvention. KEY TAKEAWAYS The list of Andrew Mayne’s careers includes magician, reality TV star, bestselling author, and inventor. He also started prompt-engineering with OpenAI long before the rest of the world had even heard of Large Language Models. Mayne joins Big Think for an exploration of AI, creativity, and the challenges of being successful in multiple fields. Excerpt: "You have to think of it like a Venn diagram: what you want, what your skills are, and what the world wants. Find the intersection."

Start by asking the question, "Relative to what?" KEY TAKEAWAYS Although we barely feel it at all, planet Earth is moving relative to every other object in the Universe: through the Solar System, the galaxy, and the Universe at large. At each scale, as we zoom out, there’s an incredible amount to learn about our motion through the cosmos, and we can even measure what it cumulatively adds up to. Whenever you ask how fast we’re moving, it’s vital to ask, “Relative to what?” After centuries of advances in astronomy, we finally know the answer, on all cosmic scales.

Aiming our attention, thoughts and careers at the world's problem s KEY TAKEAWAYS Despite caring deeply, many feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of causes they could support, which can lead to disengagement from public charity efforts. In this week’s Mini Philosophy interview with historian Rutger Bregman, we explore his concept of “moral ambition” — the idea that doing good can be treated with the same seriousness and strategy as building a career. Bregman’s “SSS framework” encourages people to focus on causes that are: sizable, solvable, and sorely neglected.

A potentially very dangerous condition Excerpt: " Even if most Americans haven’t abandoned their private sense of empathy, many don’t seem terribly bothered by the rancidness of their leaders. I confess that this indifference astonishes me. It might be the ugliest effect of Trump’s return—the rapid normalization of spectacular corruption, the desensitization to lawless power, the acceptance of moral collapse. Eventually it will coarsen us all."

The Cold War prospect of global annihilation has faded from consciousness, but the warheads remain. Excerpt: Over the past 30 years, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the prospect of nuclear war has faded from the American consciousness. With the end of the Cold War, films depicting the last days of humanity, such as 1959’s “ On the Beach ,” or the 1983 TV drama “ The Day After ,” largely disappeared from the Hollywood playbook. Schoolchildren no longer hid under their desks during practice drills to survive nuclear war. But the weapons never went away. While thousands were scrapped and nuclear inventories were significantly reduced, many other weapons were put into storage and still thousands more remain deployed, ready for use. Now, they and the dangers they pose are making a comeback. The last nuclear age was defined by two superpowers — the United States and the Soviet Union — poised to destroy one another in less than an hour. They both kept nuclear weapons locked and loaded to deter the other by threatening retaliation and certain destruction. Today’s global nuclear landscape is far more complicated and, in many ways, more precarious. More countries and more advanced technologies are involved. Weapons can fly farther, faster, from more places. Information, accurate or false, can move even more quickly. Autocrats and extremists hold positions of power in nuclear-armed countries. Nuclear threats, once taboo, are now increasingly common. And the last nuclear arms control treaty still in force between Russia and the United States expires in February.

One app to rule them all Excerpt:" If Google has its way, there will be no search bars, no search terms, no searching (at least not by humans). The very tool that has defined the company—and perhaps the entire internet—for nearly three decades could soon be overtaken by a chatbot. Last month, at its annual software conference, Google launched “AI Mode,” the most drastic overhaul to its search engine in the company’s history. The feature is different from the AI summaries that already show up in Google’s search results, which appear above the usual list of links to outside websites. Instead, AI Mode functionally replaces Google Search with something akin to ChatGPT. You ask a question and the AI spits out an answer. Instead of sifting through a list of blue links, you can just ask a follow-up. Google has begun rolling out AI Mode to users in the United States as a tab below the search bar (before “Images,” “Shopping,” and the like). The company said it will soon introduce a number of more advanced, experimental capabilities to AI Mode, at which point the feature could be able to write a research report in minutes, “see” through your smartphone’s camera to assist with physical tasks such as a DIY crafts project, help book restaurant reservations, make payments. Whether AI Mode can become as advanced and as seamless as Google promises remains far from certain, but the firm appears to be aiming for something like an everything app: a single tool that will be able to do just about everything a person could possibly want to do online. Seemingly every major tech company is after the same goal. OpenAI markets ChatGPT, for instance, as able to write code and summarize documents, help shop, produce graphics, and naturally, search the web. Elon Musk is notoriously obsessed with the idea of turning X into an everything app. Meta says you can use its AI “for everything you need”; Amazon calls its new, generative AI–powered Alexa+ “an assistant available to help any time you want”; Microsoft bills its AI Copilot as a companion “for all you do”; and Apple has marketed Apple Intelligence and a revamped Siri as tools that will revolutionize how people use their iPhones (which encompass, for many users, everything). Even Airbnb, once focused simply on vacation rentals, is redesigning itself as a place where “you can sell and do almost anything,” as its CEO, Brian Chesky, recently said . In a sense, everything apps are the logical conclusion of Silicon Valley’s race to build artificial “general” intelligence, or AGI. A bot smart enough to do anything obviously would be used to power a product that can, in effect, do anything. But such apps would also represent the culmination of the tech industry’s aim to entrench its products in people’s daily lives. Already, Google has features for shopping, navigation, data storage, work software, payment, travel—plus an array of smartphones, tablets, smart-home gadgets, and more. Apple has a similarly all-encompassing suite of offerings, and Meta’s three major apps (Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp) each have billions of users. Perhaps the only thing more powerful than these sprawling tech ecosystems is boiling them all down to a single product."

An opinion regarding the age of artifical ignorance Excerpt: "Look, I get it. Every day, dozens of headlines proclaim that AI is the next big thing, or is coming for our jobs, or might end human civilization as we know it. It's exhausting. And honestly, who has the time? We're all busy people. That's why I've compiled this comprehensive guide for those who've decided that keeping up with AI is too much work. Follow these steps carefully, and you'll maintain a comfortable distance from any technological progress that might disrupt your peaceful existence."

With a phone, anywhere else is just a tap away Excerpt: Those old enough to remember video-rental stores will recall the crippling indecision that would overtake you while browsing their shelves. With so many options, any one seemed unappealing, or insufficient. In a group, different tastes or momentary preferences felt impossible to balance. Everything was there, so there was nothing to watch. Those days are over, but the shilly-shally of choosing a show or movie to watch has only gotten worse. First, cable offered hundreds of channels. Now, each streaming service requires viewers to manipulate distinct software on different devices, scanning through the interfaces on Hulu, on Netflix, on AppleTV+ to find something “worth watching.” Blockbuster is dead , but the emotional dread of its aisles lives on in your bedroom. This same pattern has been repeated for countless activities, in work as much as leisure. Anywhere has become as good as anywhere else. The office is a suitable place for tapping out emails, but so is the bed, or the toilet. You can watch television in the den—but also in the car, or at the coffee shop, turning those spaces into impromptu theaters. Grocery shopping can be done via an app while waiting for the kids’ recital to start. Habits like these compress time, but they also transform space. Nowhere feels especially remarkable, and every place adopts the pleasures and burdens of every other. It’s possible to do so much from home, so why leave at all? Over the holidays, my family trekked to a suburban Atlanta mall to see Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker . It’s the closest theater to offer Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos, and we decided that increased color gamut and floor-rumbling sound justified the 25-mile sojourn. Seeing new movies is one of the few entertainment activities left that you really can’t do at home ( unless you’re wealthy , of course). Even so, U.S. theater attendance reached a 25-year low in 2017 . There’s so much on cable and streaming services, moviegoers need not leave the couch. With Netflix, Amazon, and Apple competing with major studios, television shows now enjoy the prestige, not to mention the budgets, previously restricted to film. Today, “event movies” such as Star Wars are the best way to lure people to the cinema. That partly explains why so many current movies are huge action flicks. It’s not that the moving image has deadened itself as art, as Martin Scorsese infamously worried last year, but that most people have shifted their attention to smaller screens. Scorcese’s latest film, The Irishman, only proves the point—it started streaming on Netflix less than a month after its limited theatrical release.