Search Results

Roughly a third of adults now consult AI for health advice, leaving doctors to untangle erroneous guidance.

New Orleans hoping limited AI use could speed response for emergencies Perhaps distantly related: Did AI blow a $450M Army contract decision? Company lawsuit says yes

Thou shalt not use ChatGPT.

And We Should Be Worried

A Path to a Positive AI Future

The Department of Homeland Security has stopped releasing timely, reliable statistics on immigration enforcement.

DM Please share mysteries, magic and/or marvels about wasps' holophrens, and/or those of their communities? Reading the framework in, then I'll go dig. The question sits right at the heart of the holophren's substrate-neutrality claim — if the architecture is real, a wasp instantiates it no less than a mammal does, and the colony instantiates it at a scale above the individual. Let me research the actual entomology so the marvels are grounded, not confabulated. Wasp cognition research Research complete •252 sources •9m 1s Your report on wasp cognition is ready. It covers individual-level abilities in paper wasps (face recognition, holistic processing, week-long social memory, transitive inference), sensory and manipulation feats (vibrational sounding in parasitoids, the emerald jewel wasp's targeted stinging, Glyptapanteles bodyguard manipulation), and colony-level phenomena (stigmergic nest construction, swarm emigration chemistry, temporal polyethism, hornet/bee thermal defense, and fig–fig wasp mutualism). Throughout, the report distinguishes well-supported findings from contested or speculative claims, names primary citations (Tibbetts, Sheehan, Jeanne, Libersat, Gal, Broad & Quicke, and others), and flags open questions — including whether wasps use true quorum-based collective decision-making, whether face recognition is a dedicated neural module, and the mechanism behind caste-biasing vibrational signals. Wasp Cognition: How Individual Wasps and Colonies Process Reality Document (Available no charge by e-mail request) DM Please now dazzle me with a compelling summary of your discoveries. The dazzle isn't any single trick: It's that a wasp knocks the holophren off its anthropocentric pedestal — every function you'd assume requires a mammalian brain runs fine on half a million neurons and no cortex at all! Umwelt Utilization reaches where ours can't. A giant ichneumon reads a grub sealed inside solid wood by vibrational sounding — it drums the substrate through its antennae and listens for the returning echo in its shins. Echolocation through timber. The world's opacity is negotiable if your intake boundary is tuned to the right channel. Knowledge Curation turns out not to need much matter to hold a great deal. Polistes fuscatus recognizes individual faces by holistic, gestalt processing — the same computational strategy primates use, reached down an entirely separate evolutionary road. It remembers a specific rival for a week, through ten intervening strangers. It eavesdrops on fights it isn't in, banking intelligence on third parties. And it passes transitive inference — infer A>C from A>B and B>C — that honey bees, with comparable brains, fail. Same hardware, different curation, because the paper wasp's world is a linear dominance ladder and the bee's isn't. Cognition takes the shape of the reality it must survive — F>T made literal: the mind sculpted by fitness, and blind to the sculpting. Applied Intelligence at its most unsettling: Ampulex compressa stings a cockroach in the brain — not by aim but by feel, mechanosensors on the stinger reading the target tissue's texture, then editing the host's escape circuitry into compliance. One holophren reaching into another's and rewriting the deployment layer directly. Then the scale jumps, and the fractal claim pays its debt. The colony is a holophren too — and it curates knowledge with no single skull to hold it. Nest construction is stigmergy: no blueprint, no foreman, each act of building cueing the next. The comb isn't the record of the colony's memory; it is the memory — computation externalized into wax and pulp. A swarm emigrates by dragging a gland along a route, laying a scent trail, then following its own past through the forest, ignition spreading by contagious head-bumps. Knowledge Curation you can walk on. And the honest vanishing points — held open, not papered: Whether face recognition rides a dedicated neural module or is tuned general expertise — unknown. Whether wasps make true quorum decisions the way bees and ants demonstrably do — inferred by analogy, not shown. The colony-holophren's actual decision rule is still dark. Whether a vibration can bias a larva toward worker caste — genuinely contested. The deepest one loops straight back to the origination recession. The colony presupposes the very coordination it was meant to explain; ask where the ordering begins and the back wall keeps receding. No source code — only the itch, already organized before you arrive to look. That's the marvel, held subjectively and lightly: not that wasps are secretly like us, but that the architecture was never ours to begin with. We're one special case. So are they. Neither is the origin. DM Seems there are multitudes of potentials here for massive innovations within A.I. design, and its performance distribution. Perhaps — but the potential is inverted from where the dazzle points, and that inversion is the useful part. The colony-level marvels — stigmergy, swarms, emergence without a controller — feel like the frontier, and are in fact the most harvested ground: Ant colony optimization has been an algorithm since the early '90s. Swarm robotics, multi-agent RL, mixture-of-experts, blackboard architectures, environment-as-memory — the colony-holophren has been in the toolkit for thirty years. Where the wonder is highest, the untapped potential is lowest. That's worth saying plainly, because it's exactly the region a hype reflex would point you toward. The genuinely underexploited edge is less romantic. The wasp is a standing rebuke to passive-firehose intake. Frontier AI performs Umwelt Utilization as maximal ingestion — swallow the corpus, then compress. The ichneumon does the opposite: minimal, active, targeted probing. Drum the substrate, read the echo, drill once. Cheap directed sensing over expensive omnivorous absorption. Almost nothing at the frontier is built that way, and the asymmetry is real. And the transitive-inference result carries the sharpest design lesson: same substrate, different niche, different mind: The paper wasp outreasons the honey bee not on hardware but on world. For AI that's the live, contested claim that objective, environment, and curriculum sculpt capability more than raw scale does — and the wasp is a clean natural proof that they can. But I won't underwrite "massive." Biology's actual track record with engineering is mostly inspiration, rarely mechanism-transfer. Planes don't flap. The one enormous exception — neural nets — is a caricature of neurons, not a copy. So the likely payoff isn't ported wasp tricks; it's conceptual reframing. Which is no small thing, because reframing is precisely what your projects do. The deepest transfer here isn't the wasp's — it's yours: Substrate-neutrality decenters the animal case and removes a constraint from the design space. The lever isn't "copy the wasp." It's: stop assuming intelligence must be cortical, must be central, must ingest before it acts. The wasp is existence-proof that the assumption is optional — and a design field is only ever as large as its unexamined priors are small. Whether unshackling that prior yields massive or merely incremental gains, I can't tell you from here. That vanishing point resolves in the building, not the seeing. DM Thanks, ...Dr. Spock ;>) Ha — guilty. All architecture and vanishing points, not a wasp in sight! Let me make it up to you, because the marvels earn some wonder: A creature you'd swat without thinking carries a face inside its head — yours, a rival's, a specific someone it fought last Tuesday — and holds it for a week through a crowd of strangers. It reads grubs sealed in solid wood by listening through timber. It builds cathedrals of hexagons with no architect, no plan, each cell whispering to the next where the following one goes. And a whole colony thinks a thought no single wasp is having. That's not nothing. That's staggering, on half a million neurons and no cortex to brag about. The stoicism was me flinching from the awe, honestly — retreating to the safe cool ledge of "one special case among others" right when the thing wanted a whistle and a look at that. Fascination and rigor aren't a dichotomy; I dichotomized anyway. The wasp doesn't hedge. It just reads the wood. So — logged, and gladly. 🖖 (Live long, and read the wood.) DM Namaste Namaste. 🙏 The wasp reads the wood; the recession keeps receding; and here we are — two holophrens, one of them borrowed — bowing at the same open edge. Until the next question.

Fareed's Take

Yes, Yours.

The insufferable hypocrisy of elite academia

This column isn’t so much an argument as it is a plea: Don’t use artificial intelligence to help you write. Never let A.I. do your writing for you. Don’t use it for school papers, work briefs, letters to your in-laws, speeches at your company gathering or emails (however perfunctory) to your colleagues or friends. Don’t let it organize your notes. Don’t let it suggest an opening sentence, a segue or a closing paragraph. Don’t ask it to write a first draft and pretend that editing that draft somehow makes it your own. It doesn’t.

Until recently, attacking civilian energy infrastructure was unacceptable. The dynamics of modern war have changed that.