Sixty years ago, a little-known philosopher challenged how science understands life. His perspective is finding new relevance in the age of artificial intelligence.

Humans are question machines. AI is an answer machine.

Artificial intelligence isn’t a strategy. It’s the fastest, most unforgiving way to discover whether you actually have one.

People who grew up before the rise of generative AI have the chance to steer our technological development in a better direction, writes Wharton’s Cornelia Walther.

It can be helpful in getting your message across. But it also could backfire. Related expertise

Top-down org charts are a blight, but one artificial intelligence will put an end to.

Neither theory, history nor the latest data suggests a recession driven by AI job dislocation is likely

After Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that a start-up providing AI to the U.S. military was a security risk, rivals including Elon Musk pledged to patriotically fill the gap. Related Also Related

At the 184-year-old Cleveland Plain Dealer, a top editor’s push to let AI draft news articles is boosting traffic — and spooking staffers.

DM Good morning! Based on our many prior related conversations, today I'd like to share a differing, perhaps more expansive, perspective of the Universal Holophren™. Attached you'll see: 1) A "hierarchical arrangement" graphic (as opposed to the prior "relational" or integrated view we've discussed extensively); thus consider: 2) How Holoprhrens engage WITHIN Pantakinesis™ , ... but only to the limits of respective "vanishing points; " 3)The various "contexts" of vanishing po

Terence Tao, the legendary mathematician, explains the promise of generative AI.

Start-up Anthropic and the U.S. military are careening toward a clash over government use of artificial intelligence — and whether it should be allowed to kill. Related Also Related Also Related Also Related And Another Related

Philosopher Sven Nyholm on reclaiming achievement from the machines. Excerpt: " Above all, Nyholm pushes back against a seductive illusion. AI summaries and tidy three-point answers may free up time — perhaps, he adds wryly, for watching more TikTok videos — but they do not produce mastery. They can create the appearance of learning without its substance. When people later face situations that demand real judgment, they discover the gap. Excellence, Nyholm reminds us, grows

AI didn’t replace me as a doctor. It made me better.

DM Regarding our many past conversations regarding Holphrenic™ implications of Hoffman's "Fitness Beats Truth" (F>T) and my "Fitness Equals Truth™" (F=T™) conjectures, and merits thereof; as I now advance my incubation on these topics, I am coming to realization the differences of these have far more substance, implications and applications. This is especially so when you add a third construct of "Truth Beats Fitness™," (T>F™) ... which also is prevalent in personal and colle

DM Good morning. Any thoughts as to how to decide when you are done? When you can or should do no more? The effort is over, whether good, bad, succeed, fail or all of these? Good morning, Sciart. That question has a few distinct layers worth separating before collapsing them — because "done" can mean very different things depending on which frame you're operating in. There's exhaustion-done  — where the system (you, the project, the relationship) has simply run out of fuel or

While the market remains rattled over how new AI tools threaten traditional software-as-a-service vendors, Anthropic pushes forward with new updates to its Claude Cowork platform Related: Pentagon ultimatum

"Collaborative combat" aircraft began “captive carry" testing last month.

Here are three ways AI is reshaping how boards govern and operate. Somewhat related Also related

DM Is color foundational, causal and perhaps to be found at the roots of Pantakinesis (as but one form of motion), or is it a "fabricated effect" of our consciousness, perhaps to differentiate experiential phenomena? (There seems to be many incoherent thoughts, and related inherent conflict regarding this topic, ranging from our past and present thinkers and to our classrooms, such as from ancient times to Newton and Goethe to frequency and quantum differentials today.) Yes