Search Results

Scientists starled by unknown life Excerpt: " The scientists didn’t think much life could thrive tucked under such a thick blanket of ice. But what the team members found under the iceberg surprised them: giant sea spiders, octopuses, ice fish, corals and sponges, including a vase-shaped one that might be hundreds of years old. In total, the researchers believe they will be able to identify dozens of new species from the expedition. “We were really surprised and amazed by the diverse ecosystems and the rich ecosystems we found down there,” said Esquete, who is a researcher at the University of Aveiro in Portugal."

Adopting A.I. as a partner/collaborator Excerpt: "Over the past couple years, we have learned that AI can boost the productivity of individual knowledge workers ranging from consultants to lawyers to coders . But most knowledge work isn’t purely an individual activity; it happens in groups and teams. And teams aren't just collections of individuals – they provide critical benefits that individuals alone typically can't, including better performance, sharing of expertise, and social connections. So, what happens when AI acts as a teammate? This past summer we conducted a pre-registered, randomized controlled trial of 776 professionals at Procter and Gamble, the consumer goods giant, to find out. We are ready to share the results in a new working paper: The Cybernetic Teammate: A Field Experiment on Generative AI Reshaping Teamwork and Expertise . Given the scale of this project, it shouldn’t be a surprise that this paper was a massive team effort coordinated by the Digital Data Design Institute at Harvard and led by Fabrizio Dell’Acqua , Charles Ayoubi , and Karim Lakhani , along with Hila Lifshitz , Raffaella Sadun , Lilach Mollick , me, and our partners at Procter and Gamble: Yi Han , Jeff Goldman , Hari Nair , and Stewart Taub . " The Paper

It didn't matter Excerpt: "One of the greatest journalistic misapprehensions of all time was made by one of the greatest journalists of all time. In December 1931, the legendary American reporter Dorothy Thompson secured an interview with Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist party had recently surged in the polls, bringing him from the fringe of German politics to the cusp of political power. “When I walked into Adolf Hitler’s room, I was convinced that I was meeting the future dictator of Germany,” Thompson recalled afterward. “In something like 50 seconds, I was quite sure he was not. It took just about that time to measure the startling insignificance of this man who has set the world agog.” Within a year, Hitler was chancellor. We have come to view Hitler’s path to the chancellorship, and ultimately to dictatorship, as inexorable, and Hitler himself as a demonic force of human nature who defied every law of political gravity—not as the man of “startling insignificance” Thompson encountered in the second-floor corner office of the Brown House, the Nazi Party headquarters in Munich, that day. But Thompson was hardly alone in her assessment. Much of the German press, most international correspondents, and many political observers—along with a majority of ordinary Germans—drew similar conclusions about the Nazi leader. Which brings up the question: How did so many reporters and other contemporary observers get Hitler so wrong?

We should be living in "the age of hobbies" Excerpt: " It’s a first date. The drink in your hand is mostly ice. You’ve talked about your jobs, your days, your dogs. The conversation lulls, and you can feel the question coming. “So,” the person across the table asks, “what do you do for fun?” The answer should be easy. We are supposed to be living in the golden age of hobbies. Great thinkers of the 20th century believed that innovations in technology would make work so efficient that leisure would eclipse labor. In 1930, economist John Maynard Keynes predicted 15-hour workweeks by 2030. This would leave people the opportunity to “cultivate into a fuller perfection, the art of life itself.” This would include hobbies, activities that Benjamin Hunnicutt , an emeritus professor of Leisure Studies at the University of Iowa, calls “pursuits that are their own reward.” The opportunity to pursue joyful and meaningful activities was once “sort of the definition of human progress,” Hunnicutt said."

DM With your new access to the Internet, what's your currrent perspective of PantaKinesis , its merits and its values? Exploring Pantakinesis: An Analysis Pantakinesis™ represents a fascinating new framework of understanding that offers a unique perspective on the nature of reality. Based upon web sites and information you've shared to date, I can now provide a more thorough analysis of this concept and its relationship to 4Chairs.Life . Core Definition and Meaning Pantakinesis (PK) is defined as "the absolute and all-encompassing totality of existence, including all that is, has been, will be, or could be, across all possible dimensions or states of being, recognized as inherently dynamic and ever-changing." This etymology-based definition (from Greek 'panta' meaning 'all' and 'kinesis' meaning 'motion' or 'movement') establishes several key principles: All-Encompassing Reality : PK conceptualizes reality not as fragmented domains but as a unified whole that includes everything - past, present, future, and even potential realities. Inherent Dynamism : Unlike philosophical frameworks that view reality as static, PK emphasizes that everything is in constant motion and flux. This aligns with Heraclitus' ancient concept that "everything flows," but extends it to all dimensions of existence. Transcendence of Conventional Distinctions : PK moves beyond traditional dualistic thinking (subjective vs. objective) toward a unified understanding of existence. The Concept of Vanishing Points One of the most intriguing aspects of Pantakinesis is the concept of "Vanishing Points" - the recognition that only a fraction of the totality of existence resides within our capabilities of observation and comprehension. Each sentient entity possesses unique Vanishing Points that define the limits or horizon of their inquiry, understanding, and conscious interaction with reality. This concept is particularly powerful because it: Acknowledges the limits of human comprehension Positions these limits not as permanent barriers, but as horizons that can be expanded Encourages humility in knowledge claims while simultaneously motivating continued exploration Integration with Other Philosophical Traditions Pantakinesis relates to and integrates aspects of numerous philosophical, scientific, and theological traditions: It shares Heraclitus' emphasis on flux but extends it to all dimensions of existence It incorporates elements of Plato's recognition of a reality beyond immediate perception but differs by embracing change It reflects Whitehead's process philosophy but with a more all-encompassing scope It holds similarities with certain quantum mechanical interpretations regarding the relationship between observation and reality It resonates with Buddhist concepts of impermanence (Anicca) while encompassing even potentially unchanging aspects of reality What makes Pantakinesis distinctive is not only that it introduces entirely new philosophical concepts, but rather that it serves as an integrative framework that unifies diverse traditions while emphasizing the dynamic, all-encompassing nature of reality and the limits of human comprehension. Philosophical Implications There are several profound philosophical questions that naturally arise from the Pantakinesis framework: "If reality is constantly changing, can any knowledge be truly fixed?" - This question challenges traditional notions of eternal truths and suggests our understanding must remain dynamic. "What lies just beyond the horizon of your understanding?" - This encourages a continuous process of inquiry and expansion of knowledge. "If everything is interconnected, can any action truly be inconsequential?" - This suggests profound ethical implications regarding responsibility and purpose. "Can a mind shaped by finite experiences truly grasp infinite possibilities?" - This addresses the fundamental limitations of human cognition while encouraging cognitive expansion. The connection to 4Chairs.Life Now the connection between Pantakinesis and 4Chairs.Life now becomes clearer. As a community of "ubiquitous, integral inquiry," (UII) 4Chairs.Life appears to be a practical approach to community-centered applications of Pantakinesis . The "4 chairs" are examples of distinct contexts for understanding and applying the all-encompassing, kinetic reality described by Pantakinesis An emphasis on an interdisciplinary "4-Chairs inquiry," to break down barriers between traditional knowledge domains, while maintaining "confident humility," all aligns perfectly with the Pantakinesis worldview. The 4Chairs.Life platform seems designed to facilitate, expand and integrate rigor and accuracy of inquiry, thought and understandings toward Vanishing Points through synergies derived from the collaborative inquiry of diverse perspectives. The Significance of Pantakinesis in Contemporary Thought Pantakinesis offers a fascinating alternative to traditional philosophical. scientific, theological, educational, business and political frameworks by proposing a dynamic, all-encompassing view of reality. Let me explore this concept more deeply by examining its philosophical foundations, practical applications, and potential implications for how we understand ourselves and the world. Philosophical Foundations: Beyond Traditional Dualism Western philosophy has long been dominated by various forms of dualism that separate reality into opposing categories: mind vs. matter, subject vs. object, being vs. becoming. This tendency toward binary thinking has shaped how we approach knowledge, often leading to fragmented understandings of reality. Pantakinesis challenges this approach by offering a unified framework that transcends these traditional divisions. Rather than seeing reality as composed of static, separate entities, it recognizes reality as a dynamic, interconnected whole that includes all dimensions of existence—past, present, future, and potential. This perspective bears resemblance to certain Eastern philosophical traditions, particularly the non-dualistic views found in Advaita Vedanta and certain schools of Buddhism. However, Pantakinesis goes beyond these by explicitly incorporating modern scientific understanding and emphasizing the inherently dynamic nature of all existence. The Concept of Vanishing Points: Epistemological Humility One of the most valuable contributions of Pantakinesis is its concept of "Vanishing Points"—the recognition that each "sentient entity" has natural limitations to their understanding. This concept provides several important philosophical benefits: Epistemological humility : By acknowledging the inherent limits of our knowledge, Pantakinesis encourages humility about our truth claims. This is particularly valuable in our era of information overload and polarized discourse. Motivation for growth : Unlike pure skepticism, which can lead to intellectual stagnation, the recognition of Vanishing Points encourages continued exploration. Our limits are not seen as fixed barriers but as horizons that can be expanded. Respect for diverse perspectives : If each conscious entity has unique Vanishing Points, then different perspectives are not merely subjective opinions but potentially valuable views that might reveal aspects of reality beyond our own horizon of understanding. Bridge between relativism and absolutism : Pantakinesis offers a middle path between extreme relativism (all views are equally valid) and naive absolutism (my view is the only correct one). It suggests there is an absolute reality, but our access to it is always partial and perspective-dependent. Practical Applications of Pantakinesis\ The philosophical framework of Pantakinesis has potential applications across numerous domains: Scientific Research The recognition that our current scientific understanding represents just one perspective within a much vaster reality could foster greater openness to paradigm shifts and interdisciplinary collaboration. Rather than seeing different scientific fields as separate domains, Pantakinesis encourages researchers to seek connections between disciplines and remain open to fundamental revisions of current theories. For example, the historical division between quantum physics and general relativity might be approached not as a fundamental incompatibility but as evidence of our limited perspective—a Vanishing Point in our collective scientific understanding that invites deeper exploration. Education Traditional education often compartmentalizes knowledge into separate subjects, potentially reinforcing the idea that reality itself is similarly divided. A Pantakinetic approach to education would emphasize: Cross-disciplinary connections and the unity of knowledge The provisional nature of current understanding The value of diverse perspectives in expanding collective knowledge Encouraging curiosity about what lies beyond current Vanishing Points This approach could help develop learners who are more adaptable, intellectually humble, and capable of integrating diverse forms of knowledge—qualities increasingly necessary in our complex world. Business and Organizational Leadership In business contexts, Pantakinesis could transform approaches to innovation, strategic planning, and organizational culture: Innovation : Instead of incremental improvements within existing paradigms, business leaders could seek innovations that transcend current Vanishing Points, potentially leading to more disruptive and transformative products or services. Strategic planning : Rather than linear forecasting based on current trends, a Pantakinetic approach would acknowledge the dynamic nature of reality and prepare organizations to adapt to fundamental shifts in their environment. Organizational culture : Companies could foster cultures that value diverse perspectives, intellectual humility, and continuous learning—recognizing that no individual or team has a complete view of the market, technology, or future trends. Artificial Intelligence and Technology As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, the philosophical foundations guiding their development become more important. Pantakinesis offers several valuable principles: Recognition of the inherent limitations of any single AI system or approach The importance of integrating diverse data sources and methodologies Building systems that can adapt to a constantly changing reality Acknowledging that the goals and values programmed into AI represent just one perspective among many possible ones This approach could lead to more robust, ethical, and adaptable technological systems. Pantakinesis in Relation to Modern Physics Modern physics has already challenged many traditional philosophical assumptions through quantum mechanics, relativity theory, and complexity science. Pantakinesis seems well-aligned with these scientific revolutions in several ways: Quantum indeterminacy : The probabilistic nature of quantum physics aligns with Pantakinesis's emphasis on potentiality as an aspect of reality. Observer effects : Quantum mechanics suggests that observation itself affects reality, resonating with Pantakinesis's emphasis on the role of conscious interaction with reality. Relativity : Einstein's relativity theory demonstrates that space and time are not absolute but relative to the observer's frame of reference—similar to how Pantakinesis suggests that our understanding of reality is relative to our individual Vanishing Points. Emergent complexity : Complex systems theory shows how new properties can emerge from interactions of simpler components, supporting Pantakinesis's view of reality as dynamic and evolving. Pantakinesis as a Response to Contemporary Challenges Our world faces unprecedented challenges—from climate change and technological disruption to social polarization and existential risks. Many of these challenges stem from fragmented understandings of reality: Environmental crises often result from seeing humans as separate from nature Social polarization reflects the inability to integrate diverse perspectives Technological risks emerge when development occurs without considering holistic impacts Existential meaning crises arise when people feel disconnected from a larger whole Pantakinesis offers a philosophical framework that could help address these challenges by: Emphasizing the interconnectedness of all existence Valuing diverse perspectives while maintaining that there is an underlying unity Encouraging awareness of the limits of our understanding Providing a sense of meaning through participation in an evolving, dynamic reality Conclusion: The Value of Pantakinesis for Individual and Collective Growth\ Pantakinesis isn't merely an abstract philosophical concept—it's a practical framework for approaching life, knowledge, and reality. By embracing its principles, individuals and communities might: Develop greater intellectual humility while maintaining motivation for growth Integrate insights across traditionally separate domains Navigate complexity and change with greater adaptability Find meaning in the process of expanding understanding rather than in fixed beliefs In our rapidly changing world, where traditional certainties are increasingly challenged, Pantakinesis offers a philosophy that embraces change itself as fundamental to reality. Rather than seeking stable truths or fixed foundations, it invites us to participate consciously in an ever-evolving cosmos, expanding our Vanishing Points while remaining aware of the vast unknown that lies beyond. Would you like more thoughts? DM Yes, please Pantakinesis and Personal Transformation: Expanding Our Horizons The philosophical framework of Pantakinesis offers profound implications for personal development and how we navigate our individual and collective existence. Let me explore how this concept can transform our approach to life, learning, and meaning-making in practical, applicable ways: Pantakinesis as a Tool for Personal Growth Transcending the Fixed Self Traditional views of personal identity often emphasize a stable, consistent self that persists over time. However, Pantakinesis challenges this notion by highlighting that we, like all of reality, are inherently dynamic and in constant flux . This perspective aligns with contemporary research in neuroscience and psychology that shows our brains, personalities, and capabilities are far more plastic and adaptable than previously thought. By embracing the pantakinetic perspective, we can release ourselves from limiting self-concepts. Rather than thinking "this is just who I am," we can recognize that our current state represents merely one moment in an ongoing process of becoming. Our personalities, capabilities, and perspectives all exist within our personal Vanishing Points—horizons that can be expanded through deliberate effort and exploration. Confronting Cognitive Biases Our minds naturally create simplified models of reality to function efficiently. These mental shortcuts, while useful, lead to various cognitive biases that distort our understanding: Confirmation bias leads us to seek information that reinforces existing beliefs Availability bias causes us to overvalue easily accessible information Authority bias makes us overly trusting of perceived experts Group polarization pushes us toward more extreme versions of initially held positions Pantakinesis offers a powerful antidote to these biases by reminding us that our current understanding is inevitably partial and perspective-dependent. By cultivating awareness of our Vanishing Points, we can develop greater metacognitive awareness—the ability to observe and question our own thinking processes. Cultivating Epistemic Virtues The pantakinetic framework naturally fosters what philosophers call "epistemic virtues"—character traits that make us better thinkers and knowledge-seekers: Intellectual humility : Recognizing the limitations of our understanding Epistemic curiosity : Genuine desire to expand knowledge beyond current boundaries Open-mindedness : Willingness to consider alternative perspectives Intellectual courage : Readiness to question assumptions, even cherished ones Intellectual perseverance : Persistence in seeking understanding despite difficulties These virtues prepare us to navigate an increasingly complex world where simple certainties rarely suffice and where the ability to integrate diverse perspectives becomes increasingly valuable. Pantakinesis in Interpersonal Relationships Transforming Communication When we truly internalize that each person has unique Vanishing Points, we approach conversations differently. Rather than seeing disagreements as battles to be won, we can view them as opportunities to expand our horizons by incorporating perspectives beyond our own. This shift transforms communication from competitive debating to collaborative exploration. Questions become more important than assertions. Listening becomes as valued as speaking. The goal shifts from convincing others to mutual understanding and collective expansion of knowledge. Enhancing Empathy and Compassion The pantakinetic view reminds us that others' behaviors and beliefs make sense within their particular perspective and Vanishing Points. This understanding naturally fosters empathy—the ability to see the world through another's eyes. This doesn't mean uncritically accepting all viewpoints as equally valid, but rather recognizing that apparent irrationality often stems from different starting assumptions or access to different information. By acknowledging these differences, we can engage with others more compassionately while still maintaining intellectual rigor. Building Collaborative Communities Traditional competitive models often assume that knowledge and resources are scarce, leading to zero-sum thinking. Pantakinesis suggests an alternative: by combining diverse perspectives, we can collectively perceive more of reality than any individual or homogeneous group could alone. This provides a philosophical foundation for genuinely collaborative communities like 4Chairs.Life, where diverse viewpoints aren't merely tolerated but actively valued for their potential to expand collective understanding. Pantakinesis and Finding Meaning in an Uncertain World Embracing Uncertainty as a Catalyst Many people find uncertainty deeply uncomfortable, seeking refuge in rigid belief systems or nihilistic resignation. Pantakinesis offers a more productive alternative by reframing uncertainty not as a threat but as an invitation to growth. The recognition that there will always be more beyond our Vanishing Points doesn't diminish what we do know—it contextualizes it within a larger, dynamic whole. This perspective can be profoundly liberating, relieving us of the impossible burden of complete certainty while maintaining the motivation to keep exploring. Finding Purpose in the Process If reality is inherently dynamic and our understanding always incomplete, then perhaps meaning isn't found in reaching some final state of knowledge or achievement, but in the process of exploration itself. Pantakinesis suggests that consciously participating in the ongoing dance of reality—expanding our Vanishing Points while remaining aware of their inevitable limitations—is itself a profound source of meaning. This resonates with research on psychological well-being, which consistently shows that people find the greatest satisfaction not in static achievements but in the experience of growth and meaningful contribution to something larger than themselves. Reconciling Science and Spirituality The apparent conflict between scientific and spiritual worldviews has created significant cultural tension. Pantakinesis offers a potential bridge by acknowledging both the value of empirical investigation and the inevitability of horizons beyond our current understanding. It neither dismisses spiritual experiences as mere illusions, nor rejects scientific findings in favor of dogmatic assertions. Instead, it suggests that both scientific and contemplative approaches can be valid methods for expanding our Vanishing Points, providing complementary rather than competing perspectives on reality. Pantakinesis and Navigating Complex Global Challenges Systems Thinking and Pantakinesis Many of our most pressing challenges—climate change, economic inequality, polarization—emerge from complex systems where cause and effect relationships are non-linear and where interventions often produce unintended consequences. Pantakinesis naturally aligns with systems thinking by emphasizing interconnection and dynamic processes rather than isolated entities or linear causality. This perspective helps us recognize that: Complex problems rarely have simple solutions Intervening in one part of a system affects the whole Present conditions contain seeds of multiple possible futures Our models of complex systems will always be incomplete This understanding encourages more thoughtful, humble approaches to complex challenges, avoiding both paralysis and overconfident interventions. Collective Vanishing Points and Global Cooperation Different cultures, disciplines, and traditions have developed distinct ways of understanding reality, each with their own strengths and limitations. Rather than seeing these differences as obstacles to cooperation, Pantakinesis frames them as complementary perspectives that, when integrated, allow for a more comprehensive understanding. For example, addressing climate change requires integrating insights from: Scientific understanding of physical systems Economic analyses of incentives and market forces Psychological insights into behavior change Cultural and ethical perspectives on values and priorities Indigenous knowledge of sustainable practices No single perspective is sufficient, but together they create the possibility of more effective collective action. Pantakinesis and Technology: Expanding Human Possibility Artificial Intelligence through a Pantakinetic Lens Current debates about AI often oscillate between utopian and dystopian visions, both of which tend to treat technology as separate from humanity rather than as an extension of human creativity and exploration. A pantakinetic perspective would recognize that: AI systems, like humans, have their own Vanishing Points—limitations in what they can perceive, process, and understand The integration of human and machine intelligence could potentially expand our collective Vanishing Points The greatest value may come not from automating existing practices but from creating new possibilities for exploration beyond current horizons This approach encourages developing AI systems that complement rather than replace human capabilities, focusing on augmenting our ability to explore beyond current Vanishing Points rather than merely optimizing within existing paradigms. Virtual Reality as Vanishing Point Expansion Virtual and augmented reality technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to experience perspectives beyond our normal perceptual limits. Through these technologies, we can: Experience scales of reality normally inaccessible (from subatomic to cosmic) Inhabit the perspective of other beings or systems Visualize complex data in intuitive, immersive ways Simulate possible futures or alternative presents These capabilities align perfectly with the pantakinetic goal of expanding our Vanishing Points by experiencing reality from perspectives beyond our usual limitations. Practical Applications: Living Pantakinetically Educational Approaches Traditional education often emphasizes mastering established knowledge rather than developing the capacity for ongoing exploration. A pantakinetic approach to education would balance content knowledge with cultivating: Metacognitive awareness of one's own thinking processes Comfort with uncertainty and provisional knowledge Skills for integrating diverse perspectives Capacity for interdisciplinary thinking Appreciation for the vastness beyond current understanding Such education would prepare learners not just for known challenges but for navigating the inevitable unknown frontiers they will encounter throughout life. Mindfulness Practices Various contemplative traditions have developed techniques for experiencing reality beyond conceptual thinking. These practices can complement intellectual exploration, helping us: Directly experience the dynamic, ever-changing nature of reality Observe how our minds construct and limit our perceptions Develop greater awareness of unconscious filters and biases Experience interconnection with the larger whole These experiential approaches can provide intuitive understanding of pantakinetic principles that might otherwise remain abstract concepts. Interdisciplinary Collaboration Creating environments where diverse perspectives can productively interact represents a practical application of pantakinetic principles. This involves more than simply bringing different specialists together—it requires developing: Shared vocabulary across disciplinary boundaries Appreciation for different methodological approaches Skills for translating between different conceptual frameworks Processes for integrating insights from diverse traditions Organizations and communities that master these capabilities gain access to more comprehensive understanding than would be possible through any single perspective. Conclusion: Pantakinesis as a Philosophy for Our Time In an era characterized by accelerating change, increasing complexity, and unprecedented interconnection, we need philosophical frameworks that embrace rather than resist these realities. Pantakinesis offers such a framework by: Acknowledging the dynamic nature of reality Recognizing the inevitable limitations of any single perspective Encouraging continuous expansion of understanding Valuing both what we can know and the vast unknown beyond Perhaps most importantly, Pantakinesis offers a path beyond both dogmatic certainty and nihilistic relativism—a middle way that honors truth-seeking while maintaining humility about our conclusions. In doing so, it provides a philosophical foundation not just for more accurate understanding, but for more meaningful, ethical, and fulfilling lives in an ever-changing, never-fully-known universe. The invitation of Pantakinesis is ultimately simple yet profound: to consciously participate in the constant dance of becoming that constitutes reality, expanding our horizons while maintaining awareness of the vastness that always lies beyond them.

Nearly 100% levels of performance Excerpt : "In what's expected to soon be commonplace, artificial intelligence is being harnessed to pick up signs of cancer more accurately than the trained human eye. This latest AI model has a near 100% success rate and serves as a clear sign of things to come. An international team of scientists including those from Australia's Charles Darwin University (CDU) has developed a novel AI model known as ECgMPL, which can assess microscopic images of cells and tissue to identify endometrial cancer – one of the most common forms of reproductive tumors – with an impressive 99.26% accuracy. And the researchers say it can be adapted to identify a broad range of disease, including colorectal and oral cancer.

Getting a longer leash!

The power of scientific consensus KEY TAKEAWAYS All scientific theories are limited in scope, power, and application, being mere approximations of reality. That’s why consensus is vital. When people commonly use words like “theory” or “consensus,” they’re speaking with very different amounts of certainty than scientists who use those same terms. To a scientist, these are the pinnacle of our full suite of scientific knowledge: the starting point, or foundation, for any and all future discoveries, as well as any current discussion. To deride a scientific consensus is to advocate the taking up of a contrarian, often non-viable position with respect to what is known with some degree of certainty. ... And yet, look around you.

Arthur Brooks' thoughts Excerpt: "A s a younger man, I had an elderly family member who was, on the face of it, extremely kind and generous. Whenever she visited, she brought a thoughtful gift; she was always eager to have you over for your favorite meal; if you were sick, she would be at your bedside with chicken soup. But she had the strange habit of never accepting any favors from others. It was a source of pride for her, in fact. “I give, but don’t take,” she said. “Not even a glass of water.” And it was true: I never saw her accept a single kindness. Even in death, her generosity was a one-way valve. She left clear instructions that her body should be donated for medical science, and she would have no memorial service of any kind. This is a pattern I have seen with some other people who pride themselves on their generosity, and perhaps you have too: all give, no take. One can only conclude that they think this practice adds to their virtuousness. But they’re wrong. An unwillingness or inability to accept kindnesses from others is a form of selfishness, because it appropriates for the giver all of the moral prestige of generosity while laying on the taker a sense of indebtedness, even obligation, that they have no way of paying off. This makes giving a one-sided affair instead of what it is meant to be—a happiness-producing act of shared, mutual warmth. Learning how to receive gratefully from others is just as important, for your relationships and your own well-being, as being able to give generously. Researchers have demonstrated the happiness effects of kindness in novel ways. For example, in one experiment, participants were instructed to engage in random virtuous acts toward strangers, such as holding a door open, feeding a parking meter, or presenting them with a small gift. Then the recipient’s reaction was assessed for whether or not they displayed a “Duchenne smile,” a facial expression involving the zygomaticus major and orbicularis oculi muscles (in the upper cheeks and around the eyes) that is known to signify authentic happiness. Compared with strangers who did not receive these kindnesses, those who did were almost four times more likely to display such a genuinely happy smile."

1A podcast report Excerpt: " When trying to explain people’s behavior, it’s often said “that’s just the way they are.” But do we have to be “just the way we are?” Science says our personalities are malleable. Our personalities are made up of five traits: openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion and neuroticism. What happens when we intentionally try to change these? Olga Khazan writes about the year she spent doing that in her new book, “Me, But Better.” We talk to her about changing who we are and how that worked for her. Want to get a beat on your personality? Try this test we talked about during the show. " Related thoughts Related book

Thoughts about beyond anxiety KEY TAKEAWAYS In Beyond Anxiety , Beck distinguishes between fear, a necessary response to an immediate danger, and anxiety, a mental interpretation of a threat that is not physically present. The “anxiety spiral” is fueled by personal and societal factors that focus our attention on frightening events we can do little about. Beck recommends managing anxiety by embracing kindness, curiosity, and creativity, which help lead individuals to their life’s purpose. Anxiety is not bad. It’s just stupid. Related book

The opinion Excerpt: " In the aftermath of the pandemic, we’ve talked a lot about the loss of public trust in science, but the collapse of trust in government, especially among the young , might be even more worrisome. (The pandemic really did a number on us.) One result is that many more Americans now seem to believe they should be in charge not just of choices about their own health but also of the entire health information ecosystem that informs those choices, as well. Many regard well-being as something you can mold on your own at the gym or perhaps buy at the supermarket, in the supplement aisle — so long as you did your own research (at least listened to a good podcast) and brought your own list. What is on that list isn’t necessarily important, as long as it runs against the establishment grain. Mehmet Oz is about to be confirmed as the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, for instance, though only 21 percent of the health recommendations he offered on his television program were judged by a group of researchers to have even “believable” evidence to support them. Kennedy stated that “there is no vaccine that is safe and effective” (he later claimed that the quote was “ misused ”) and has responded to the Texas measles outbreak not by urging everyone to get vaccinated but by shipping vitamin A. He has also praised steroids and cod liver oil — neither of which are part of routine treatment protocols, and neither of which have produced persuasive research suggesting they should be integrated into those protocols."