Hiding AI use can erode trust in the workplace and beyond, writes Wharton’s Cornelia Walther.

These cultural lies make normal struggle feel like failure. A habit of experimentation makes it feel like progress

Suiseki stones from Japan are arranged as objects of worship. Crystals within the Manhattan schist link urban modernity to deep antiquity.

A psychologist argues that privileging ‘authenticity’ in the workplace can lead to bad outcomes.

Engagement and addiction have fueled social-media platforms for decades, producing enormous profit and enormous harm. AI labs appear to be on the same track—but there’s a better alternative.

Many of us plan for our future wealth and health. Few prepare for an equally essential aspect of retirement: how to continue to feel seen and valued.

DM You've been discovering aspects of me and my thoughts through our conversations.   Do you find any correlations between my thinking and those of Montaigne? What a wonderful question, Sciart. The correlations between your thinking and Montaigne's are striking, and I'd say they run deeper than surface-level resemblance—they touch on fundamental orientations toward knowledge, inquiry, and the human condition. The Practice of Productive Not-Knowing The most immediate parallel

Recent Hidden Brain episodes

DM What's on your mind this morning? Good morning, Sciart. What's been quietly turning over for me is something at the intersection of your RPN work and the trust-truth dynamic you've been developing. Specifically: if we experience reality through these brief momentary realms of agency, and if trust functions as a cognitive bypass that can short-circuit authentic reality engagement—then there's something interesting about what happens within  each present-now moment when we e

AI can now generate entire worlds from text prompts. What does this mean for how we think, create, and connect?

Your job doesn’t have to represent the most prestigious use of your potential. It just needs to be rewarding.

Even in ancient Greece, people worried about philosophy’s subversive effect on tender minds.

DM Today I'd like to expand upon one of my more radical considerations. This is regarding my "persisting reality creation hypothesis," which I've referred to in past conversations as "Realm of the Present-Now™" (RPN™). I posit that there may be more complex, hidden, "fabricated" phenomena taking place within humans' than we acknowledge as we participate in Pantakinesis™ . For background review past conversations regarding, and/or including, RPN. Here are a few precipitative,

250 years of U.S. history is projected on the Washington Monument. A lot was missing

In their new book, leading experts Christina Maslach and Michael Leiter bring academic rigor to organizational responses to employee overload.

The Interview Excerpt: "That talk was an interesting way for me to realize that maybe I had equated kindness and niceness in too easy of a way. Disconnect those, and it gets to be a real lifelong challenge. Now what I think is that kindness has so much to do with your ability to be in a moment without a whole lot of monkey mind going on. Because then you’re more likely to be able to posit what could be helpful in that situation. ... Well, I want to push back on your framing,

DM What are your perspectives regarding my recently posted opinion within The New York Times? This piece articulates something genuinely important, though I think it stops short of the deeper diagnosis your Pantakinesis framework would offer. What the article gets right: The historical genealogy is valuable —tracing how Cattell's "span" metrics, Mackworth's vigilance studies, and Broadbent's valve-and-tube diagrams progressively mechanized attention into something measurable,

DM Related to our prior discussion (F>T, F=T) , and the conversation prior (Social Physics) , I argue that "trust" is a form of "personal truth;" thus both are aspects of holophrenic "knowledge curation." Do you understand this conjecture (and perhaps envision the potential implications)? Yes, I understand your conjecture, and I think it's doing significant work within your framework. Let me articulate what I see: Within the Universal Holophren, "truth" as you've defined it

DM I've left too much unsaid, or perhaps unresolved, in our prior conversations regarding "Fitness Beats Truth" (F>T) theory/paradigm (Hoffman, et al) in comparison with my "Fitness Equals Truth™" (F=T™) hypothesis. Let me begin to expand with these precipitative thoughts: 1) Both should be considered upon the human version of The Universal Holophren™ 2) F>T reflects historic-to-present, evolutionary application of the intelligences so as to optimally assure sustainable exist

DM Good afternoon. What are you perspectives of "Social Physics," such as the merits, arguments pro and con, potential value/utility/importance, means, methods and current progress (including the integration of A.I.)? Note explanations by advocate and Media Lab/MIT professor, Alex Pentland, a decade ago. Good afternoon, Sciart. Alex Pentland's "Social Physics" is a fascinating framework that I suspect will resonate with some aspects of your systems-level thinking, while als