Sixty years ago, a little-known philosopher challenged how science understands life. His perspective is finding new relevance in the age of artificial intelligence.

Humans are question machines. AI is an answer machine.

The trouble with believing anything and nothing at the same time

The human brain is vastly complex and often operates outside of our awareness, which begs the question: Are we even in control of our own minds?

Romantic love as a cultural invention that’s making us miserable.

When people born blind gain sight, the hardest part isn’t opening their eyes — it’s teaching the brain how to see.

All the President’s Portraits

Rather than follow a rigid blueprint, executives must help organizations focus on sensing and responding to unpredictable market conditions.

Dina Nayeri’s family fled Iran when she was a child. Now, amid an ongoing protest movement during which the regime has killed thousands, she hears echoes of regime talking points seeping into the West.

DM Good morning! Based on our many prior related conversations, today I'd like to share a differing, perhaps more expansive, perspective of the Universal Holophren™. Attached you'll see: 1) A "hierarchical arrangement" graphic (as opposed to the prior "relational" or integrated view we've discussed extensively); thus consider: 2) How Holoprhrens engage WITHIN Pantakinesis™ , ... but only to the limits of respective "vanishing points; " 3)The various "contexts" of vanishing po

Philosopher Sven Nyholm on reclaiming achievement from the machines. Excerpt: " Above all, Nyholm pushes back against a seductive illusion. AI summaries and tidy three-point answers may free up time — perhaps, he adds wryly, for watching more TikTok videos — but they do not produce mastery. They can create the appearance of learning without its substance. When people later face situations that demand real judgment, they discover the gap. Excellence, Nyholm reminds us, grows

DM Regarding our many past conversations regarding Holphrenic™ implications of Hoffman's "Fitness Beats Truth" (F>T) and my "Fitness Equals Truth™" (F=T™) conjectures, and merits thereof; as I now advance my incubation on these topics, I am coming to realization the differences of these have far more substance, implications and applications. This is especially so when you add a third construct of "Truth Beats Fitness™," (T>F™) ... which also is prevalent in personal and colle

The findings may help explain why this group has such exceptional memory. Related research paper

DM Good morning. Any thoughts as to how to decide when you are done? When you can or should do no more? The effort is over, whether good, bad, succeed, fail or all of these? Good morning, Sciart. That question has a few distinct layers worth separating before collapsing them — because "done" can mean very different things depending on which frame you're operating in. There's exhaustion-done  — where the system (you, the project, the relationship) has simply run out of fuel or

When carmaker Audi initiated a change process, they decided to trust the power of questions.

Middle-aged Americans are considering a new possible explanation for their slowing brain.

A leading expert on family rifts describes what to do when a relationship between a parent and child is on the brink of breaking

Inside the strange zoo of speculative evolution.

Women might be having an even harder time.

From early on, what has set the human species apart from all others is the ability to direct ever-increasing power toward our ends.